Do explicit interventions impact critical thinking positively?

Colorful question marks represent FAQs
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

 “Improvement in students’ critical thinking skills and dispositions cannot be a matter of implicit expectation…educators must take steps to make critical thinking objectives explicit in courses and also include them in both pre-service and in-service training and faculty development.”

From a meta-analysis, published in the Review of Educational Research, which examined 117 studies involving 20,298 participants.  Investigators reported an average positive effect size (g+) of 0.341 and a standard deviation of 0.610, with fluctuations in CT effect sizes related to the type of instructional intervention and pedagogy applied. The conceptualization of critical thinking used in this meta-analysis research is the APA Delphi construct.

The same construct as is used in the development of Insight Assessment tests and measures, namely that critical thinking is the process of purposeful self-regulatory judgment focused on deciding what to believe or what to do.

Reference: “Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis.”  Philip C Abrami; Robert M Bernard; Evgueni Borokhovski; Anne Wade; et al, Review of Educational Research; Dec 2008; 78, 4; Research Library. pg. 1102.

Contact Us

Let our team of experts help you select the best assessment instrument for your project. You will hear from us within 1 business day.
    By selecting this box, you are agreeing to receive promotional messages from Insight Assessment. Terms and Privacy policy can be found at insightassessment.com/article/terms. Insight Assessment does not share or sell personal data.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.