|
This
landmark 1990 report describes the findings of the two year project
to articulate an international expert consensus definition of critical
thinking, including its core cognitive skills. The experts identify
the characteristics of an ideal critical thinker, and present specific
recommendations relating to critical thinking instruction and assessment.
"The
Critical Thinking Movement" of the 1980s witnessed a growing accord
that the heart of education lies exactly where traditional advocates
of a liberal education always said it was -- in the processes of inquiry,
learning and thinking rather than in the accumulation of disjointed
skills and senescent information. By the decade's end the movement to
infuse the K-12 and post-secondary curricula with critical thinking
(CT) had gained remarkable momentum. The momentum continues to build
now, in the 21st Century, as employers, educators, and policy-makers
continue to endorse the development of students' critical thinking as
an essential educational priority. Then, and perhaps still today, the
successes of "The Critical Thinking Movement" raised vexing
questions for educators: Which skills, exactly, are the ones that comprise
the core group of critical thinking skills? What pedagogical approaches
are most effective to teach for critical thinking, and not simply about
critical thinking? What assessment strategies and tools work best for
the assessment of critical thinking as a required student learning outcome?
When
asked by the individual professor or teacher seeking to introduce CT
into her own classroom, such questions are difficult enough. But they
took on social, fiscal, and political dimensions when asked by campus
curriculum committees, school district offices, boards of education,
and the educational testing and publishing industries. Given the central
role played by philosophers in articulating the value, both individual
and social, of CT, in analyzing the concept of CT, in designing college
level academic programs in CT, and in assisting with efforts to introduce
CT into the K-12 curriculum, it is little wonder that the American Philosophical
Association, through its Committee on Pre-College Philosophy, took great
interest in the CT movement and its impact on the profession. In December
of 1987 that committee asked Dr. Peter Facione to serve as the lead
investigator to coordinate an international effort to determine the
extent to which experts agreed on the definition of critical thinking
for purposes of college level teaching and assessment. The result became
known as "the Delphi Report," a document which continues to
influence critical thinking theory, teaching, and assessment in the
full spectrum of academic disciplines and professional fields.
TABLE
1
CONSENSUS STATEMENT REGARDING CRITICAL THINKING AND
THE IDEAL CRITICAL THINKER
"We understand critical thinking to be purposeful, self-regulatory
judgment that results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation,
and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual,
methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations
upon which that judgment is based.
CT is essential as a tool of inquiry. As such, CT is a liberating
force in education and a powerful resource in one's personal
and civic life. While not synonymous with good thinking, CT
is a pervasive and self-rectifying human phenomenon.
The ideal critical thinker is habitually inquisitive, well-informed,
trustful of reason, open-minded, flexible, fair-minded in evaluation,
honest in facing personal biases, prudent in making judgments,
willing to reconsider, clear about issues, orderly in complex
matters, diligent in seeking relevant information, reasonable
in the selection of criteria, focused in inquiry, and persistent
in seeking results which are as precise as the subject and the
circumstances of inquiry permit.
Thus, educating good critical thinkers means working toward
this ideal. It combines developing CT skills with nurturing
those dispositions which consistently yield useful insights
and which are the basis of a rational and democratic society.
|
As
Table 1 suggests, a key result of inquiry is the articulation by a panel
of CT experts of a conceptualization of CT it terms
of two dimensions: cognitive skills and affective dispositions.
- Section
II of the report describes the Delphi research methodology.
-
Section III address the skill dimension of CT;
- Section
IV focuses on the dispositional dimension of CT.
-
The Delphi Report concludes with fifteen recommendations pertaining
to CT instruction and assessment are presented.
Download
a complimentary copy of the Executive
Summary.
|